The Rise of Russism

crimea referendum

 

Today Crimea is voting to join Russia in a local referendum. We all know the result, 100% or even 150% will be in favour.

The referendum is being held under an armed occupation.

Voters only have two options: join Russia immediately or revert back to the 1992 constitution when Crimea was declared independent. No option to stay with Ukraine.

The ethnic Russian population of Crimea makes up 59% with many in favour of joining up with Russia. However there are also the indigenous Crimean Tatars (13% of the population) who are very much against breaking away having suffered immensely under Russian rule firstly with Catherine the Great who demolished mosques across the peninsular resulting in many Tatars fleeing. Then came Stalin who deported the entire population of 250000 accusing them of collaborating with the Nazis. Half of them died and others remained in exile until the Soviet Union collapsed when they gradually started returning to their homeland. The Ukrainian population of 25% is also against splitting from Ukraine.

Whether there is a majority of Russians living there or not doesn’t make a difference, Crimea is part of Ukraine and has been since 1954.

If Crimea chooses to join Russia in a legal NATIONAL referendum, then Russia can legitimately claim it as it’s own. Ukraine’s constitution only allows national referendums, any local referendum is thus void.

Since Putin follows his own rules, a legal referendum is obviously out of the questions. Voting will be done Russian style: rigging, bribing, intimidating, and a full on army to ensure a favourable result.

Friday 28th February, 6000 Russian soldiers landed in Crimea. This takeover had already begun days earlier with gangs of armed men blockading the Parliament and roads. The two airports were taken over and then Ukrainian military bases. Only when Crimea was under complete lockdown did Putin admit Russian soldiers were involved.

The radically pro-Russian leader Sergey Aksyonov (whose Russian Unity Party only won 4% support in the last regional election) replaced the Crimean Prime Minister. Then as the parliament remains under siege by armed men, MPs vote to have a referendum May 25th, then pushed forward to March 30th and then to March 16th.

The puppet PM called on Russia for help asking for military intervention to protect Crimea from nationalist radicals in Ukraine. Russia eagerly obliged and the Kremlin gave Putin the godhead to send 25000 soldiers to Ukraine.

Having already sneaked a load of men into Crimea to secure the area, another load openly invade.

Russia has violated several international agreements with these actions. Under the 1999 agreement governing presence of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, which has had it’s base there since 1783, troop movements outside official base areas have to be agreed with Ukrainian authorities beforehand.

Russia, along with the UK and the US, is also a guarantor of Ukraine’s territorial sovereignty and current borders under the 1994 Budapest Memorandum. Ukraine surrendered its nuclear weapons after the collapse of the Soviet Union in exchange for this guarantee.

Putin has explained the invasion in order to “save” Russian citizens and the Russian speaking communities in Ukraine, the majority actually holding Ukrainian citizenship.

No one except the puppet Crimean PM and an ex-president now in hiding in Russia have asked for Russia’s “assistance”.

Crimea was stable with no sign of threat or “ethnic cleansing” by nationalists before the Russian army came to town. Now of course the Tartars and Ukrainians living there are looking to flee.

Russian-speaking Ukrainians also played an important part in the revolution. Anyone who has been to Maydan would have seen a big banner with Kharkiv written in bold letters hanging near Kreshchatyk Street. Each region also has its own tent pegged in the square, including many from the East and South such as Donbass and Odessa. At rallies banners and placards from all over the country waved. The revolution was not solely a Kiev and Western Ukrainian movement but a national one.

Eastern regions had a lot to overcome in order to participate being more under Ynukovych’s control. Police and government hired thugs known as “Tetushkis” squashed protests in the East through beatings. People who did attend rallies risked loosing their jobs since many businesses there trade with Russia and students risked being kicked out of University. People were also forced to march in anti-Maydan demonstrations or loose their jobs. “They are not free,” a Maydan protester told me.

Some Ukrainians do not agree with new interim government and the revolution, especially since the abolition of the language law allowing Russian as second official language. Russian media has branded the opposition and Maydan supporters as neo-Nazis further raising alarm.

Extremist groups are a minority which has attracted the most attention. The far-right party Svaboda, which has neo-Nazi roots originally being the Social-Nationalist Party of Ukraine, is now considered a nationalist party focusing on anti-corruption. Toning down its extremist views is obviously a way to gain more support but it is still far from being the most popular among Ukrainians. Its politicians currently hold 5 government positions. Other positions such as the Prime Minister and President are held by the center-right Batkivshchyna (Fatherland) Party. There are also prominent activists included who suffered from kidnappings and assassination attempts under Yanukovych.

As for ethnic cleansing, there has been no such thing happening.

If anyone has suffered from ethnic cleansing in Ukraine it has been Ukrainians with 7-11million murdered under Stalin and the Crimean Tartars. The Jewish population was also nearly wiped out under the Nazis.

Russian and Ukrainian speakers are very much intertwined with family and friends on both sides. The so-called rift between the communities has been exaggerated by Putin to justify invasion. Ukraine is not black and white with bitter hatred between ethnic groups. Politics is what divides people. There are Russian speakers who are ardent revolutionaries and Ukrainian speakers who are against. Its not the language you speak, it’s the views you hold.

Yanukovych, who still claims to be the legitimate President, has utterly no support. His own party members voted for his impeachment and he is even despised in his stronghold regions such as Donnestk and Crimea. Border guards in Donnestk refused to let him board his private jet when he attempted to escape and Crimea didn’t welcome him either. Why else would he be hiding out in Russia?

After hearing that Yanukovych asked Russia to invade his own country, everyone is disgusted (I bet even his own mother). If he ever makes it back here, many will happily see him hang in The Hague.

How can you still be President when the entire country has booted you out?

Only Putin recognises him as such since Yanukovych is a useful pawn in the grand master plan of conquering Ukraine.

This operation is not about protecting the Russian speakers in Ukraine. The Russian government doesn’t even protect its own people back home who suffer major human right abuses – no freedom of speech, media censorship and propaganda, false imprisonment, assassinations, mass corruption and poverty.

Crimeans hoping for a better life under Putin are in for a rude awakening. Russia is not the Promised Land and Putin is certainly not Jesus Christ coming to save them from evil damnation.

The interim government in Kiev is a threat to the Russian state not the people. This is about keeping Europe and the US out and Russia in.  There are currently 30,000 soldiers in Crimea and Russian military lined across the border to Northern and Eastern regions of Ukraine.

Fascism has risen – in the shape of Putin, or rather as the Ukrainians put it “Russism”.

 

Russism

 

 

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “The Rise of Russism

  1. Fascists in Control.
    What is a Fascist? I have no idea. Could a Fascist be a Nationalist? Or Capitalist? Why do we get FASCIST, then a photo of Hitler?
    Your advice appreciated.
    Uncle Ray.

    • The photo above is the Pro-Putin rallies in Moscow March 15th 2014. The photo underneath is in Nuremberg 1938, looks like time hasn’t changed much. As for fascism, ask Putin he seems to be the expert on the subject.

      • But the photo of Putin, with a mass of people, could equally have been taken in Kiev. We have Nazis, or Fascism. Then on the other side, Communism.
        I know what Communism is. But I still do not know what Fascism is.
        You have used the word Fascism, please explain what it means, or what it does.
        Uncle Ray.

    • Yanukovych’s paid rallies in Kiev would come near to that photo in Moscow. None of the Maydan protests resembled a military style parade. There was another rally in Moscow March 15th against the occupation in Crimea with thousands of Muscovites attending. Now that one did resemble the mass protests in Kiev. Putin may have a revolution of his own if he keeps up this Ukraine mission.

      Re Fascism, here’s the dictionary definition and you can read up on Hitler and how he annexed Austria, exactly what has happened with Crimea:

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fascism

      And here’s an article on Russism aka Fascism with a Russian twist:

      http://www.kavkazcenter.net/eng/content/2002/03/25/327.shtml

      and wikipedia on Russism:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleksandr_Ivanov-Sukharevsky

      • It can easily be argued, since Hitler was Austrian, that Austria annexed Germany. In any case, the Austrians welcomed becoming part of Germany.
        The flag waving bit of the article suggests to me that America is Fascist. They wave a lot of flags.
        Surely, instead of calling people Fascist who just want to abscond from The Ukraine and become Russian, you could call them Leavers.
        Plus, if leaving a country makes you a Fascist, then what about the Balkan nations who left Yugoslavia.
        The point is about language and being clear in what you are writing. Old labels do not today adequately describe the situation in the Crimea.

      • I am calling Putin a fascist, not Ukrainians wanting to join Russia.

        “Old labels do not today adequately describe the situation in the Crimea.”

        Why is Crimea plastered with posters like this then?

        http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10695038/Russian-TV-swamps-airwaves-in-Crimea-propaganda-war.html

        The Russian government is zealously using “old labels”, branding Ukraine fascist. Ukrainians have actually come up with a brand new label for Putin and his invasion: Russism.

        Re Austria, the annexation was in fact a coup d’etat by the Austrian Nazi Party. Only after the German army had marched in and taken control did they hold a referendum, with not surprisingly nearly 100% in favour. Austrians just like Ukrainians living in Crimea, did not have a choice. Voting at gunpoint.

        My language is perfectly clear. You just don’t want to read properly.

  2. “How can you still be President when the entire country has booted you out?” Very simple. !. The entire country did not boot him out. The entire country was not standing in the Maidan or throwing petrol bombs @ Police. The expression of the will of the people is through elections. If they are manifestly flawed as e.g in Zimbabwe in 2004, that is one thing, but the election which brought Yanukovych to power was recognised as fair by the EU monitors @ the time. Just because Arsenyuk & his allied Right Sector thugs didn’t like the result they engaged in a putsch. backed up with US $.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s